11 Minute Read

Tales of a Technician: Goldilocks and the Three Stops

June 1, 2016

By | 12 Comments

Tales of a Technician: Goldilocks and the Three Stops (Photo by Tony Hand on Unsplash)

Once upon a time there was a trader named Goldilocks. Her days were spent roaming the halls of Wall Street, reading charts, and deploying lots and lots of dough. One day she came across a sweet setup in Fiserv (FISV). ‘Twas a bull retracement boasting low risk and high reward. It beckoned to Goldilocks with promises of profits.

And Goldilocks responded.

Take a look at the price action in FISV to see if you too would have scooped up some shares.

FISV

Like a good little trader she placed her entry just above the prior day’s high. Such positioning ensured the price would be heading higher before she jumped aboard.

Then came the tricky part – stop placement. As with most traders the objective was to find that sweet spot; not too tight, not too loose, but juuuust right. While Goldie was surveying the chart she could hear her mentor’s voice echoing through the halls of memory, “remember, you should get stopped out of a trade when your reason for entering is no longer valid.” And, “Once the chart pattern has been rendered moot, head for the hills.”

Since the bull retracement pattern in FISV would have been invalidated on a break below the lowest day of the current pullback ($100.80), that is where Goldilocks was considering placing her stop. Could she place it below the previous support level at $96.37? Sure, but that would be too loose. It would take her risk per share unnecessarily high. The breach of $100.80 would also correspond with a break of the 20-day and 50-day moving average giving yet more reasons to jump ship. No need to wait until the $96 zone is breached. The retracement is officially broken below $100.80 so, again, bail.

What would be considered too tight in this scenario? Really, anything above the $100.80 level which is essentially the prior day’s low. You have to at least wait for the stock to take out the pivot, otherwise you’ll get shaken out on noise.

Here’s Goldilock’s recap:

  • Too tight: $101 or higher
  • Too loose: $96.37
  • Juuuust right: $101.80

Another way to understand why the $96 level wouldn’t be ideal for a stop loss is because we typically use a break of the current support level to signal the bull retracement has failed, not a break of a previous support level. See below for illustration:

FISV stops

I’ve seen many a new trader come across my desk with an obsession on stop placement. And understandably so. They want to get it right! Here’s a dirty little secret. How low below support you place a stop loss is totally personal preference. Super tight and you have less risk, but a greater chance of getting whipped out. Really loose and you have less chance of whipsaw, but more risk per share.

Oh… and Goldilocks lived happily ever after:)

P.S. Credit for today’s post goes to DANAYABETHEA who posed a great question in response to my recent stock report. I leave you with a mystery which demands investigation. Readers must guess at the answer. And if you get it right, I’ll use my good will capital to curry favor with the Market Gods. They will shower you with love.

Ready for the question?

Is DANAYABETHEA a first name, last name, or both? And, if both, where does the first name end and the last name begin?

Go ahead. Impress me.


Tackle Trading: Financial Freedom is a Journey. Sign up now for a 15-day free trial.

Financial freedom is a journey

The Tales of a Technician series is brought to you by Tackle Trading.

Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.

Sign up now for a 15-DAY FREE TRIAL #


Legal Disclaimer

Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.

All investing and trading in the securities market involve a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax, and accounting advisors, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.

12 Replies to “Tales of a Technician: Goldilocks and the Three Stops”

  1. JoanNee says:

    Thanks for the lesson on stop placement Tyler! I’m often torn between the 1/2 ATR, prior pivot, yesterday’s close options. Staring at 10k more charts will help. I’d like some love so here’s my guess: DANAYA is the first name and BETHEA is her last name.

  2. Thomas Hammonds says:

    Great stuff Ty! How about Dan Ayabethea.

  3. KEITHGIUNTA says:

    How about “Dan and Aya Bethea”?

  4. ERICSIMMS says:

    Great story for stop loss bedtime. Hopefully, Goldilocks is still in FISV, it hasn’t flashed any sell signals like piercing the bottom of the upward channel or piercing the 20 DMA (which seems to run the bottom of the channel at this point.

  5. MatthewMcQueary says:

    Good lesson, Tyler. I’m going with Dana Yabethea

  6. Mario Gutierrez says:

    Danaya Bethea

  7. DANAYABETHEA says:

    Thanks so much for explaining!! I will keep this in mind when entering future trades. JoanNee is correct! First name: Danaya Last name: Bethea

  8. Justin (Australia) says:

    Goldilox, Beware the Wolf of Wallstreet.lol

  9. Justin (Australia) says:

    Oh Sorry that would be look out for the BEARs!!!

  10. CYNTHIABLACKWELL says:

    Thanks for the teaching, Tyler.

  11. FrancesK says:

    Great lesson on stops, thanks!
    My vote is for: Danay Abethea

  12. Rani Bush says:

    Late to the party but my guess would be Danaya Bethea. Thanks for your excellent words of wisdom!

Comments are closed.

Chart Modal

Tackle Trading

Book a FREE Consultation

Sign up for a free consultation to build your Educational Plan.