While USO may not actually rendezvous with zero, it’s certainly getting close enough for option traders like myself to petition the market gods for a split. Its ultra-low price tag is starting to annoy me. It should be bugging you too. You see, option trades are hard to structure on cheapskate securities in the dollar holler club (my totally made up name for stocks in the single digits). Yes, I know USO isn’t yet sub-$10 but it’s so close I gave it honorary membership.
So what’s the problem? Well, have you ever tried to structure a spread trade on a cheap stock? It can be done but it’s expensive, not to mention terribly inefficient. In this case I don’t mean expensive from a capital outlay perspective, I mean expensive as in commission costs relative to potential profit. Ideally, the commission required for a trade sits no more than about 10% of the potential profit. If I enter a trade with the ability to generate $100 in profits, I don’t want to have to pay more than around $10. Might you be okay with a bit higher commission cost like 15% or 20% of potential profit? Sure. But for heaven’s sake, man, don’t sabotage the trade from the get-go with burdensome costs.
Obviously, the lower the better.
Case in point. With USO perched at $11 I can sell a one month 10/8 bull put spread for 27 cents credit. If I’m paying $1.50 a contract, that’s $3 total to enter. Even if I end up letting the spread expire worthless that $3 represents 11% of the potential profit. If you’re like most traders and try to exit early by snatching back the spread for, say, 5 cents, now you’ve really blown your costs out of the water. You made 22 cents but had to pay $6 for the trade. That’s 27% of the profit.
Lame.
In contrast, on a $50 stock I should be able to sell a $5 bull put spread for around 60 cents credit. The $3 to enter only represents 5% of the potential profit. Even if I pay another $3 to exit at 5 cents, I’m still limiting the cost to around 10% of profit. That’s a far cry better than 27%, no?
But wait, Tyler, why not just sell naked puts?
You could, but I don’t like being relegated to only selling naked options because it makes no economic sense to do a spread. And even with naked options it’s going to get to the point where short-term out-of-the-money options for USO are trading for pennies. So how to fix it?
Split the ETF, son!
No, not that kind of split. A reverse split. Never seen one of those? Count yourself lucky. It’s an event known only to sucky stocks. Jack the price of USO fourfold to around $40 and reduce the shares outstanding by four, a so-called 1-for-4 split. Or better yet, lift the price to $100 (1-for-10). I don’t care. Just solve the problem.
Once the price is higher we’ll have that much more juice in the OTM options, not to mention all the additional OTM strikes that actually have some premium in them to choose from when structure trades.
Want a successful example of this happening? Check out the iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-term Futures ETN (VXX).
The reverse split solution has been implemented three times in VXX. The volatility ETN is yet another popular product whose suckitude necessitated a number of resurrections to extend its shelf life. VXX burst onto the volatility scene in January 2009 at a cool $100. Then, the plunge began and it hasn’t stopped since. The first time VXX reverse split (1-for-4) its price chart was adjusted so that it looked like the fund started trading at $400. The next time if reverse split (1-for-4, again) the initial price lifted to $1600. The third and final time (so far at least) it was adjusted to $6400.
Now you know why VXX’s chart looks like a falling safe. $6400 to $19, Wow! VXX, you suck. Were it not for some reverse split magic you would have done been dead years ago.
And the upside down banana split? How else are you supposed to convey the idea of a reverse split?
Financial freedom is a journey
The Tales of a Technician series is brought to you by Tackle Trading.
Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.
# Sign up now for a 15-DAY FREE TRIAL #
Legal Disclaimer
Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.
All investing and trading in the securities market involve a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax, and accounting advisers, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.
9 Replies to “Tales of a Technician: Why USO Needs to Split…Pronto”
Thanks Tyler always enjoy the articles. Question for you. So if I’m holding 100 shares of USO now and I’m selling covered call on it, and it reverse split 4 to 1 then I’d only have 25 shares at the new price. Is that correct and then I wouldn’t be able to sell calls against it anymore ?
Thanks!
That’s correct. But, you have other, perhaps superior, alternatives at that point. This, along with Mario’s comment necessitates more commentary. I feel a follow-up post coming on…
On second thought. It depends on whether they change the multiplier of the option to adjust for the split. I didn’t have any option positions on during the VXX reverse splits so I don’t know what they did there. But, theoretically, they could adjust the multiplier on existing USO options from 100 to 25 to ensure they aren’t causing any grief for those holding covered calls (they would become naked…).
Don’t like that idea, for the same reason Kody just said. I would have to buy a little more of USO to be able to sell calls
Tyler, my head is exploding!!
Well pick them brains up and put ’em back in because I’ve got plenty more where that came from.
No way dude. I can’t own uso for 100 bucks a share. I want to have several 100 shares cheap for when it goes up. And I need to be able to cover it for now.
Thanks for the follow up Tyler. I’d love to sell some credit spreads as well so I would adjust my approach if price was reverse split. May that is where you are heading with your next article 😉
Comments are closed.