My internal wiring sometimes leads me on a never-ending questioning quest. While such an inquisitive nature can result in many worthwhile revelations, it does come with a variety of annoyances. The world of “what-ifs” is exciting, but often becomes an endless stream of time-wasting if one forgets to bring along a dash of moderation. Sometimes excessive tinkering yields the complete opposite result than originally intended. For example, attempts to morph a good trading strategy into a better one often lead to worsening its performance.
Traders are particularly susceptible to falling into the tinkering trap following a bout of underperformance. Suppose you have a strategy that normally works well but goes through a couple losing months in a row. During such a spell most traders waffle between the following two choices – stay the course as favorable conditions should eventually return or modify the strategy in an attempt to improve its performance if the unfavorable conditions persist.
I would note, however, a third alternative exists.
Suppose we employed a market neutral trading strategy using iron condors each month in an attempt to profit from neutral or range-bound market conditions. When using this approach a strong trending market (up or down) would be considered unfavorable conditions. Now, let’s say we’re coming off two months of a strong uptrend and are feeling somewhat tempted to tinker with the condor strategy to improve its performance. Rather than traversing the potential treacherous tinkering route, how about leaving the iron condor strategy as-is and instead adding a trending strategy to your arsenal to complement the non-trending one?
Such a trending strategy may incorporate long or short stock plays, directional credit spreads, or any other approach designed to thrive when mean reversion is dead.
You may find this third door a superior alternative to the first two. The idea, of course, is to have the strengths of the trending strategy offset the weaknesses of the non-trending strategy and vice versa.
In the end I like the idea of running a simple non-trending strategy simultaneously with a simple trending strategy over attempting to construct a complex hybrid strategy that supposedly will weather all environments.
Beware the tinkering trap. Many a fool have fallen prey to it.
Financial freedom is a journey
The Tales of a Technician series is brought to you by Tackle Trading.
Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.
# Sign up now for a 15-DAY FREE TRIAL #
Legal Disclaimer
Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses, and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.
All investing and trading in the securities market involve a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax, and accounting advisors, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.
7 Replies to “Tales of a Technician: The Tinkering Trap”
%100 % agree, i super proud that you are part of my mentor that change my live ,
So true!
Good thoughts Tyler. Should “Tinkering” be confined to system development?
Tinkering is for virtual trading, system development and back testing… Live trades should be based on the system and rules generated by the trial and error of “tinkering”
Timely. Thank you.
Those of us who are easily distracted really pay heavily for what-if behavior. Alternatives to everything is so attractive. Thanks Tyler.
Just fell into the “Tinkering Trap”. Luckily it was with fakey money. Thanks for letting me know I’m not alone. Lesson learned.
Comments are closed.