Last update: August 2021
When weakness strikes and downtrends come knockin’, bear call spreads are the go-to strategy for cash flow seeking, high probability loving traders. They boast the profit-generating power of naked calls but without all the capital-consuming baggage. But what do you do when a well-crafted and expertly placed bear call won’t straighten up and fly right?
You either exit or hedge.
It’s the latter tactic that takes center stage in today’s blog. Let’s make sure we first understanding why hedging a bear call may be beneficial to simply exiting. The virtue of exiting is also its vice. While closing down a bear call run amok ensures you don’t lose any more money, it also denies you any shot at redemption. In all of trading, there is perhaps no more frustrating situation than getting stopped out of a trade right before it finally moves in the originally forecasted direction. Veterans call this whipsaw and it’s a curse.
While hedging a losing bear call doesn’t eliminate the potential for additional losses, it does at least leave the door open for the stock to finally cooperate and your loss to eventually turn back into a gain. It’s keeping the dream alive that, not to mention milking time decay, that motivates the proactive trader to hedge an ailing bear call.
Perhaps the most popular strategy to use as a hedge is the bull put spread. Let’s look at an example to illustrate. Tesla Inc recently slipped into a downtrend. Suppose we wanted to capitalize on continued weakness by selling a bear call spread. With TSLA at $312.60, we could sell a January (58 day) $365/$375 bear call spread for $1.01 credit. Here is the initial risk graph with the trade details displayed on the right. Familiarize yourself with the potential risk, reward, and breakeven.
Now, suppose the magic of Elon grips the stock sending prices to the moon. First, TSLA breaches resistance at $327, then $333, then the 50-day moving average gives way at $337. At some point you may decide you want to hedge. Since the bear call is bearish (duh!) we need to add a bullish trade to hedge. To maintain our short premium, positive theta posture, selling a bull put spread is a logical hedge to use. I would stick to the same month (January) and shoot for a similar delta and credit. That means we’d look to sell an OTM bull put where the short put strike has a delta close to the delta of the short call originally sold as part of the bear call. Since we typically sell deltas around 20 or less, then that’s what I’d be looking for on the bull put. We initially received $1.01 on the bear call so I’d look for a similar credit on the bull put I was adding.
Remember, it doesn’t make any sense to add a 5 delta bull put for 20 cents credit to hedge a 15 delta bear call that paid a $1 credit. That will make the resulting position too lopsided.
Suppose when TSLA breaks the $337 resistance level we sell the Jan $290/$280 bull put for $1.80. Doing so morphs our trade into an iron condor, specifically a Jan $280/$290/$365/$375 iron condor for a total net credit of $2.81. The $1.80 captured from the bull put will reduce our upside risk slightly as well as raise the overall breakeven. That means TSLA can now rise a bit further before I lose money at expiration. Perhaps the best way to illustrate is to show an overlay of the original bear call spread risk graph with the new iron condor.
Like the previous illustration, the blue line represents the original bear call spread and the orange line represents the Iron Condor. You may need to study the graphic for a minute to fully grasp the difference between the two positions. Here are the three key impacts of the hedge:
First, the upside breakeven shifts from$366.01 to $367.81. That means TSLA can now rise further at expiration before we lose on the overall position (see what arrow). This provides a bit more breathing room on our bear call.
Second, the overall credit (i.e. profit potential) increases from $1.01 to $2.81 (see yellow arrow). That means if TSLA can remain somewhat rangebound we’ll make more money now that we’ve added the hedge.
Third, the trade-off for the previous two benefits is that we now have downside risk. If TSLA now falls in price below $289 then we would have been better off by not adding the bull put (see red circle).
The best-case scenario after adding the Jan $290/$280 bull put is to have TSLA fall gradually back toward the middle of the range around $320 or so. In that case, we would end up capturing a profit on the original bear call and the bull put spread we added. Perhaps the most frustrating outcome would be if Tesla shares took a nosedive right after we added the bull put spread. There’s nothing worse than getting duped into finally adding a bull put right before the stock finally falls in the originally forecasted direction.
Another way to illustrate the impact of adding the bull put to hedge is to view the profit zone on Tesla’s price chart. Here is TSLA at trade entry with the bear call spread.
And here is what happens when we add the short Jan $290/$280 bull put spread to convert the trade into an iron condor:
Notice how we shifted the upside breakeven higher providing a wider profit range on the upper end. The trade-off is we now have a downside breakeven so we’re going to be in trouble if TSLA falls too far.
There are myriad ways to manage the iron condor, but the ideal outcome is to have TSLA fall back toward the middle of the range allowing us to buy back both the initial bear call and the added bull put at a profit.
Financial freedom is a journey
Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.
Legal Disclaimer
Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.
All investing and trading in the securities market involves a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax and accounting advisers, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.