Monday’s Tales of a Technician showed how I used top-down analysis in the gold space to find Franco-Nevada. Its relative strength and leadership were obvious. And, I’m happy to report, the stock is breaking out.
Let’s use today’s Options Theory blog to map out two different trade ideas. This will illustrate strategy selection and the trade-offs for using one system over another.
FNV recently returned to the north side of its 50-day moving average amid heavy accumulation. Since then, a high base formed that ultimately broke out this week. I’d use the 200-day moving average at $135 as the next logical target.
How to Play?
The stock is $127.50 and has an implied volatility rank of ZERO. For the rookie, that means that stock options on FNV are the cheapest they’ve been for the past year.
I’d peg my bias at +1 or +2. It’s really hard to have a +3 bias on FNV when gold is still in a downtrend (see GLD) and its industry (see GDX) is below the 50-day moving average.
If I consult my strategy matrix (learn more about it here). I see that my options are either a poor boy’s covered call (aka bull call diagonal) or a bull call vertical.
The biggest determinant for me in choosing between the two is the capital requirement. The poor boy is more expensive than the bull call vertical. This where account size, existing positions, and preference enter the equation. In this situation, I think both trades work.
Let’s build one of each.
Bull Call Vertical
The bull call spread consists of buying a lower strike call and selling a higher strike call in the same expiration month. The risk is limited to your original purchase price and the reward is limited to the spread width minus the cost.
With FNV near $127.50, I could buy the May $125/$135 bull call for $4.15. The max loss is $4.15 and will be lost if the stock sits below $125 at expiration. The max gain is $5.85 but requires FNV to rise above $135 by expiration.
If I didn’t want to risk the entire $4.15, I could place a stop loss below the low of the high base pattern near $121. That would shrink the loss closer to $1.70.
Poor Boy’s Covered Call
The poor boy’s covered call involves buying a longer-term ITM call (to act as a stock substitute) and then selling a short-term OTM call (typically the same strike you would sell if you were building a traditional covered call).
Suppose we purchased the July $120 call (68 delta) while selling the May $135 call (34 delta) against it. The net debit is $10.05, or more than double the cost of the bull call vertical.
That $10 is the max loss, but a stop near the 50-day moving average ($119 – I like looser stop losses on covered call plays) would reduce the risk to around $3.20.
The max gain sits north of $6 if FNV rises beyond $135 by expiration.
One key difference between the two is their respective theta values. The bull call vertical starts out theta negative. If the stock doesn’t rise, you don’t profit. That’s why it’s more of a DELTA play.
In contrast, the poor boy starts out positive theta. Even if the stock doesn’t budge, you still score a profit.
Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.
All investing and trading in the securities market involves a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax and accounting advisers, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.