17 Minute Read

Tales of a Technician: Crude, Contango, and Drag, Oh My!

July 19, 2015

By | 9 Comments

Tales of a Technician: Crude, Contango, and Drag, Oh My!

Wall Street offers participants a broad array of vehicles for playing in the crude oil market. One of the most popular is the United States Oil Fund (USO). It boasts daily trading volume that dwarfs fellow commodity funds GLD and SLV, and has active options to boot.

In fact, we could hold USO up as the poster child for liquidity in the options market. The bid-ask differential in its front month options stands at a penny or two wide, and numerous strikes have open interest of over ten thousand contracts. USO options can be wielded with confidence of quick fills and little, if any, slippage.

While many trade USO, I suspect few understand its inner workings. Trading is difficult enough when you understand the dynamics driving the asset you’re trading. It’s darn near impossible when you don’t.

Let me begin by noting I think USO can be a fantastic trading vehicle to capitalize on moves in crude oil under the right conditions. However, you must understand its limitations.

The short version of today’s post is that USO is a pretty good proxy for crude oil in the short run. In the long run, however, it drastically underperforms. If you own shares of USO under the impression that it will mimic the price of oil over the long haul, prepare to be disappointed.

For the longer, more enlightening version, read on.


Every marketplace has its own unique quirks and characteristics. Moms and pops diving into the world of stock trading have to wrap their heads around dividends and shorting. Stock traders venturing into the options market have to learn the dynamics of implied volatility and the greeks. Option traders venturing into the futures market – or trading futures related products – must understand how to assess term structure and its twin related concepts known as contango and backwardation.

…and in case you didn’t know, it USO is a futures related product.

Term structure refers to the relationship between futures contracts and different expirations. In the case of crude oil, it basically reflects how the price of oil changes as you move from one expiration cycle to the next. Consider the following screenshot displaying light sweet crude oil futures (/CL) from August through December. Take note of how the price of oil futures (blue box) is rising as we move further out in time. August is trading for $52.82, September for $53.28, October for $53.73, November for $54.13, and, finally, December for $54.81.

Crude Futures

Term structure is often displayed in graphical form to provide a short cut for analysis. The current term structure for crude oil futures can be seen below:

Crude term structure

Notice how the term structure is upward sloping? In trader jargon, this is called contango. In other words, the front month futures are trading at a discount to back month futures. For the oil markets, this is common. Typically, back month futures do trade at higher levels than the front month.

Occasionally, the term structure inverts so that front month futures are trading at a premium to back month futures. When the curve is downward sloping like this, it’s called backwardation.

If you’re feeling a bit overwhelmed at this point, don’t worry. You don’t have to hyper-analyze the term structure of crude oil futures to dabble successfully with USO. I simply want to make sure you understand the basic concept of contango and backwardation as we’ll soon unveil the term structure of oil futures has some interesting implications with how USO behaves.


The United States Oil Fund doesn’t derive its value directly from the spot price of crude oil. It’s not like the fund owns a massive warehouse or a tanker full of barrels of oil. That would be impractical. Instead, USO uses oil futures contracts in an attempt to track crude prices for investors.  Since futures contracts expire, the fund has to continuously roll them forward over time to maintain its exposure.

Sometime between now and August expiration, USO will have to sell the August futures it currently owns and buy September futures. It’ll repeat the process before September expiration by rolling to October, and so on. If September futures were trading for the same price as August futures, there wouldn’t be a credit or debit associated with the roll. It could be done for even money, basically.

However, oil futures are usually in contango with back months being more expensive than the front month. Which means USO incurs a cost most of the time when rebalancing. Right now, for example, it would sell the August contracts at $52.82 and buy Sep at $53.28.

On a day to day basis, the roll cost’s effect is virtually imperceptible; but over time, it weighs on USO causing its performance to diverge significantly from the actual price of crude oil. Consider the sharp contrast in the price of USO and spot crude in recent years.

crude chart

Despite the latest crash, at its current price of $52.82 crude oil is still 59% higher than its January 2009 low of $33.20. USO, on the other hand, is down 22% since then. That’s a massive disconnect and can be attributed to the persistent contango in oil futures.

While the downward bent of USO over time is indisputable, it doesn’t mean it fails to mimic crude oil in the short run. The best indicator to use to compare the behavior of two different securities is correlation. The scale for the correlation indicator ranges between +1.00 and -1.00. A reading of +1.00 is considered a perfect positive correlation while a reading of -1.00 is a perfect negative correlation. Anything between 0 and +1.00 suggests both securities move in the same direction. Any readings between 0 and -1.00 suggests both securities move in opposite directions.

As shown in the lower panel of the chart, the correlation between USO and the spot price of crude oil is 0.97, which is almost perfect. That means on a day to day basis USO virtually always moves in the same direction as crude oil. And yet, though it matches the direction, it doesn’t necessarily match the magnitude. Most traders, myself included, find USO does a good enough job following crude oil to be a worthwhile proxy for short-term trades.

It’s worth mentioning that if crude oil futures are in backwardation, it’ll act as a tailwind for USO. Though they are rare, periods of backwardation lead to outperformance from USO.

Yet another source of drag on USO’s performance is its expense ratio. Though its effects pale in comparison to the contango driven drag, it still has an impact. The current annual expense ratio is 0.45%, which means that every year you’re paying roughly half a percent just for the privilege of owning the fund.

Instead of rising, say 10%, over the year, USO would rise 9.55% once the expense ratio is taken into account. This is a built-in feature of all ETFs causing them to underperform their benchmarks right out of the gate.


Here’s the bottom line for traders: USO does a pretty good job at tracking crude oil in the short run. I’ve never had much trouble with option plays like naked puts that involve selling options with around one month to expiration. If you’re looking for a long-term bullish plays in the oil patch, however, it’s worth considering other energy ETFs unaffected by drag. I’m thinking of those tied to actual energy stocks such as XLE, XOP, or OIH.

Tackle Trading: Financial Freedom is a Journey. Sign up now for a 15-day free trial.

Financial freedom is a journey

The Tales of a Technician series is brought to you by Tackle Trading.

Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.

Sign up now for a 15-DAY FREE TRIAL #

Legal Disclaimer

Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.

All investing and trading in the securities market involve a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax, and accounting advisers, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.

9 Replies to “Tales of a Technician: Crude, Contango, and Drag, Oh My!”

  1. Avatar Al Chandler says:

    Great insight Tyler!
    Al snd Jake Chandler

  2. Avatar SeungkyuBok says:

    Thank you for your insight! I have a question. Do basically all commodity ETFs such as GLD, SLV, UNG, operate in a same way?

  3. Avatar SeungkyuBok says:

    Nevermind, you already answered that in the post. Sorry

  4. Avatar Garrett Holden says:

    Just as i start to think i’m getting a good grip on understanding the complexities of the market, I learn that there are words like backwardation and contango and realize there is still so much to learn! Great article thanks Tyler

  5. Nicholas Kingsbury Nicholas Kingsbury says:

    Hey great article. We all greatly appreciate your input. Thank you.

  6. Avatar Tyler Craig CMT says:


    There are some differences between the ETFs. UNG and USO are similar in that they both invest primarily in futures contracts for their underlying commodities. As such the performance of both can deviate from the spot price of nat gas or crude oil. Both GLD and SLV own physical gold and silver so they are almost perfect proxies for gold and silver.

  7. Avatar DanielBrodhead says:

    Thanks. Never thought of all of that.

Comments are closed.

Chart Modal

Tackle Trading