Is there anything more satisfying than being wrong, yet still making money? No sir! To illustrate how such a feat is not only possible but probable (with the right management techniques), I’m starting a new series here at the Options Theory blog. The title will be as you see it above “How to Be Wrong and Still Make Money.”
This will be a monthly feature where I chronicle a trade that ran amiss but ultimately resulted in a profit. It will be a bet full of promise and potential that ended up falling flat. The lesson will be how I used a bit of magic to lift it from the ashes and thereby steal victory from the jaws of defeat.
Today we’re looking at a naked put play in EEM. That’s right. I went bullish in emerging markets, an area whose largest component is China – the country that Wall Street loves to hate of late.
There are three keys to my management magic: scaling, patience, and proper sizing.
An Atrocious Entry
Our tale begins on August 29th. EEM had recently popped above the 50-day moving average and appeared on the verge of breaking above the descending trendline that had kept a lid on it since January. Since I frequently deploy cash flow trades on EEM and hadn’t yet pulled the trigger on any October positions, I decided to dip my toe into the water with a partial batch of naked puts. I didn’t want to miss out on my monthly play if EEM was going to rip higher.
So, with EEM trading at $44, I sold the Oct $42 put for 46 cents.
And then, China punched me in the face.
EEM got monkey hammered for five straight days, falling to $41.50 on September 6th. My poor short puts tripled in value and moved ITM slightly. Here’s where the patience, positions sizing, and scaling come in.
First, cash flow plays require patience. I reasoned EEM would eventually rebound and I wanted to be there to collect when it did.
Second, the reason I was able to exercise patience and let the volatility play out is that I position sized properly. The first puts I sold for 46 cents were only one-third of what I consider a full size.
Third, with EEM now oversold and my short puts worth $1.30, I thought it was appropriate to scale-in to my second batch. I was filled at $1.27, thus raising my average credit from 46 cents to 86.5 cents (($1.27 + 0.46) / 2)
A Slightly-Less Ugly Entry
I’d love to say I nailed it with that second entry but I whiffed again. EEM fell three more days before finally bottoming on September 11th with a lovely little piercing pattern candle formation. I didn’t end up deploying the third tier because by the end of the day my Oct 42 puts had returned to close to the entry price ($1.27) for my second tier.
Then, as expected (8 days earlier, ahem) EEM bounced. Yesterday I peeled off the 2nd tier at 77 cents to lock-in a gain of 50 cents per contract ($1.27 – 77 cents). And with today’s pop, the put value has officially returned to my original entry of 46 cents.
Could I exit now and break even on the first tier? Sure. Or, I could let it ride and attempt to get closer to my original target of 5 to 10 cents.
The morals of the story are:
A) I’m an idiot with terrible timing but
B) It didn’t matter because
C) I know how to scale-in and use volatility to my advantage and
D) I’m patient and
E) I position sized properly.
Financial freedom is a journey
The Options Theory series is brought to you by Tackle Trading.
Sign up now and gain unfettered access to all of the quality content and powerful Scouting Reports that our Pro Members enjoy for 15-days absolutely free with no strings attached and let us show you what your trading has been missing.
Tackle Trading LLC (“Tackle Trading”) is providing this website and any related materials, including newsletters, blog posts, videos, social media postings and any other communications (collectively, the “Materials”) on an “as-is” basis. This means that although Tackle Trading strives to make the information accurate, thorough and current, neither Tackle Trading nor the author(s) of the Materials or the moderators guarantee or warrant the Materials or accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from the use of the Materials, whether based in tort, contract, or otherwise. Tackle Trading is providing the Materials for educational purposes only. We are not providing legal, accounting, or financial advisory services, and this is not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any stocks, options, or other financial instruments or investments. Examples that address specific assets, stocks, options or other financial instrument transactions are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent specific trades or transactions that we have conducted. In fact, for the purpose of illustration, we may use examples that are different from or contrary to transactions we have conducted or positions we hold. Furthermore, this website and any information or training herein are not intended as a solicitation for any future relationship, business or otherwise, between the users and the moderators. No express or implied warranties are being made with respect to these services and products. By using the Materials, each user agrees to indemnify and hold Tackle Trading harmless from all losses, expenses and costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from user’s use of the Materials. In no event shall Tackle Trading or the author(s) or moderators be liable for any direct, special, consequential or incidental damages arising out of or related to the Materials. If this limitation on damages is not enforceable in some states, the total amount of Tackle Trading’s liability to the user or others shall not exceed the amount paid by the user for such Materials.
All investing and trading in the securities market involves a high degree of risk. Any decisions to place trades in the financial markets, including trading in stocks, options or other financial instruments, is a personal decision that should only be made after conducting thorough independent research, including a personal risk and financial assessment, and prior consultation with the user’s investment, legal, tax and accounting advisers, to determine whether such trading or investment is appropriate for that user.